Zeiss Terra ED vs Conquest HD

When comparing any two pieces of technology or equipment, a user’s recommendation can always feature a bias.

If you ask your friend for a recommendation between two items, they will give you an idea based on their personal opinions, preferences, and experiences- factors that you might not share.

The best way to look at any equipment is through the lens of its features, and your binoculars are no exception. Every human eye is slightly different, and yours can vary wildly from those of your friends.

When it comes to the Terra ED and Conquest HD, your best bet is to weigh their features against each other and decide which best meets your needs.

Read on to learn everything that you need to know about these excellent binoculars from Zeiss.

Physical Characteristics

Size And Weight

Both the Terra ED and Conquest HD are similarly-sized binoculars. However, they are not identical in all aspects.

The Conquest HD measures in at 3/10ths of an inch longer than the Terra ED, along with being 2.5 ounces heavier.

In the grand scheme of things, 2.5 ounces does not seem like much- however, for a small set of binoculars, this weight can make all of the difference.

Ultimately, the Terra ED’s smaller size and lighter weight give it an advantage in the size and weight departments.


When it comes to durability, the Conquest HD’s heavier weight and hardier construction give it a sweeping victory over the Terra ED. 

The Terra ED features a polyamide chassis, reinforced by fiberglass for light and easily-handleable body. However, these lightweight materials are not conducive to durability.

 On the other hand, the Conquest HD features an aluminum chassis. If the Terra ED is a

When combined with its larger size and heavier weight, it becomes clear that the Conquest is the more durable of these two options.


When you use any piece of equipment, you want it to fit naturally in your hands. Binoculars are no exception to this rule. If binoculars feature poor shaping, your hands may stretch into unnatural positions and cramp up when attempting to use them. 

Thankfully, both the Terra ED and Conquest HD are notably ergonomic binoculars. If you simply want an ergonomic binocular and don’t care about it being the best possible binocular for you, either of these tools would suit you greatly.

But, which one is the most ergonomic?

Both the Terra ED and Conquest HD feature a balanced body with all controls, including the focus wheel, positioned in an efficient location for ease of use.

Both also feature a rubber casing that acts as armor and a grip. However, the Conquest’s rubber casing grips a little too well; it attracts dirt, dust, and debris like a magnet and is a challenge to clean in the field.

The Terra also features similar rubber armoring, but its texturing grants a solid grip that does not accumulate dust and debris as frequently.

Ultimately, both binoculars are very ergonomic. However, the Terra ED manages to edge the Conquest HD out ever so slightly.


Eye Relief

Eye strain is a significant issue when using any form of looking glass. 

 Anything from your glasses to a kaleidoscope can cause significant stress on your eyes, and binoculars are no exception.

One way to reduce this strain is through various methods of stress relief. 

Each binocular features something called eye relief, which is the distance between the outer eyepiece lens to your pupil.

The Conquest has a larger eye relief at 18mm, in comparison to the Terra’s 15mm eye relief.

The Conquest HD also features soft, adjustable eyecups that reduce pressure on your eyes, as well as a diopter adjustment that is 33% larger than the one on the Terra ED.

In terms of comfort, the Conquest HD has an overwhelming advantage over the Terra ED.

Performance Features

Having so many comfort features and a strong body are excellent additions to any binoculars, but ultimately, you will want your tools to perform effectively with minimal prodding. 

After all, all the comfort in the world means nothing if binoculars do not feature magnification- you want to see items at a distance, not use your binoculars as a pillow.

Ultimately, the Conquest HD outshines the Terra ED in most cases, as one would expect from its higher price range. However, there is some nuance to this statement.

For the most part, the Conquest and the Terra feature similar levels of color distinction. However, the Terra experiences slight chromatic aberration in brighter environments.

The Conquest also features a clearer image, with the Terra experiencing sharpness issues in the middle of their field of view, along with fuzziness and darkening in the periphery.

Regarding the field of view, Conquest HD wins once again with a 345-foot field of vision against the Terra, which features a 329-foot field of view at 1000 yards.

However, the Terra has significantly more effective close-focusing than the Conquest. The Terra will focus at 5 feet, while the Conquest focuses at around 6.5 feet.

In terms of performance features, the Conquest HD wins handily in most cases. However, the Terra ED features a far more effective close-focusing ability, and their color distinction is comparable.


Your binoculars are important, but sometimes, you want more than just your binoculars for the price you’re paying. 

Thankfully, the Terra ED and Conquest HD both feature a significant number of accessories. For the most part, these accessories are very similar, as well.

Both items come with a neoprene neck strap, a carrying case, a lens cleaning cloth, a set of rubber lens covers, and an instruction manual.

The lens covers and carrying case are of particular note. Let’s take a closer look.

Carrying Case

Both binoculars feature a protective carrying case, but not all carrying cases are equal.

The Conquest utilizes a boxy, traditional carrying case. Complete with a shoulder strap, this oversized carry case is perfect for safely transporting your Conquest HD.

On the other hand, the Terra ED features a clamshell-style case with a loop strap.

Neither case is particularly bad, but the boxy and secure design gives the Conquest an advantage.

Ocular Lens Cover

The ocular lens is the piece of glass you look directly into when using binoculars. Many binoculars come with lens caps to help keep these sensitive pieces of glass safe from rain and debris. 

Unfortunately, neither model features particularly intuitive lens covers. However, the Terra ED features lens covers that are easier to remove than Conquest HD’s, which frequently get stuck.

Objective Lens Covers

The objective lens in your binoculars is the glass piece on the far side, pointing at whatever you wish to observe.

In the Terra ED and Conquest HD, objective lens covers are very similar. Unfortunately, the Conquest HD’s objective lens covers fit poorly and slip off with normal movement.

Due to the insecurity of the Conquest’s lens covers, the Terra ED wins this round once again.

Comparison Summary & Conclusion

Physical Size

The Terra ED is smaller than the Conquest HD.


The Terra ED is lighter than the Conquest HD.

Field of View

At 345 feet, the Conquest HD features a larger field of view than the Terra ED does, measuring in at 329 feet.

Ergonomics And Comfort

This field is close, but the Terra ED narrowly edges out the Conquest HD as the more ergonomic option.

Color Distinction

The Zeiss Terra ED and Conquest HD feature comparable color distinction abilities.

Chromatic Aberration

The Conquest HD experiences fewer issues with chromatic aberration than the Terra ED, especially under bright-light conditions.


Both the Terra ED and Conquest HD feature similar sharpness levels.

Edge-to-Edge Clarity

The Terra ED features occasional periphery darkening and fuzziness, but the Conquest HD’s clarity is crystal clear.

Low Light Resolution

The Conquest HD is optimal in low-light conditions.

Contrast And Brightness

Both models are similar in contrast, but the Conquest’s brightness gives it an edge.

Fast Focus

The Zeiss Terra ED and Conquest HD feature comparable fast-focus abilities.

Close Focus Distance

The close focus feature on the Terra ED is far superior to the Conquest HD’s.

Waterproof Nature

Water rolls off the Conquest HD’s lenses, but not the Terra ED.


The Conquest HD is far more durable than the Terra ED.


The included accessories of these binoculars are borderline identical, but the Conquest HD features a better carrying case.

Lens Covers

When it comes to both objective and ocular lens covers, the Terra ED comes away with victory.

Warranty Coverages

The Terra ED and Conquest HD both feature the same Zeiss Limited Lifetime Warranty and 5-year No-Fault Policy in the United States and Canada.


The Terra ED, at $449.99, is almost half as cheap as the Conquest HD at $999.99.


Ultimately, it would be easier to simply skip a lot of words and claim that the Conquest HD is a higher-quality bracket due to its price. Unfortunately, that would be disingenuous.

While it’s true that the Conquest HD frequently outclasses the Terra ED, the cheaper model occasionally beats the Conquest HD- especially in cases such as lens caps.

 Neither model is inherently better than the other. Consider all available options to decide what works best for you!


Have questions about our service or product?

See FAQs now

Not Sure Which Rifle Scope is Right for You?

Get expert advice and find the rifle scope that will increase your shooting accuracy and improve your hunts!

Our business hours are Mon-Fri, 9am-5pm.