Riflescopes are a must to make the most of your firearm and provide an accurate shot. Two of the most popular choices include the Zeiss Conquest and LRP. In this article, we’ll discuss each product to determine which is better.
The best way to compare two products, especially riflescopes, is to dive into the technical specifications. These items make up the riflescope system, from how well it will magnify an object in the distance to the available impact point correction.
Here’s what we will cover in this category:
These will make it clear which product stands out on top.
Let’s discuss these topics to determine where the Zeiss Conquest and LRP emerge. You should have enough information to pick your next high-quality riflescope.
Our first topic to cover is the general performance of each riflescope. If a product doesn’t perform well, there is little point attaching it to your firearm - it will just let you down. The Conquest and LRP compete well in this category.
The Conquest has a magnification of 3 to 18x, while the LRP has one of 3.6 to 18x. Both have an objective lens diameter of 50 mm, putting them very close thus far. They also have identical eye reliefs at 3.5”/89 mm and a diopter correction of -3.0 to +2.0.
The field of view is also slightly different. The Conquest offers 3x: 37.2’ @ 100 yards, while the LRP boasts 3.6x: 30’ @ 100 yards. The former has an exit pupil diameter of 3x: 9.5 mm and 18x: 2.8 mm, while the latter offers 3.6x: 9.3 mm and 18x: 2.8 mm.
The winner in the performance category is the Zeiss Conquest. It is better able to perform over distances and allows more range for the person on the viewing end of the scope.
Next, it’s vital to go over the viewing portion of the riflescope. Let’s dive into the reticle of each product.
The reticle types differ between these two products. The Zeiss Conquest has a Type 6 Reticle, which offers a second focal plane, allowing a scope closer to your eye. It’s more detailed for a more effective shot.
On the other hand, the Zeiss LRP has a ZF-MRi Reticale, which offers a first focal plane. In this system, the reticle shifts in size based on your zoom.
Both products offer an illuminated reticle to make it possible to see at night. There are no details about the illuminated color or brightness settings, so they tie in that area.
The winner here depends on what you prefer. A second focal plane is ideal for higher magnification ranges, but those who want precision may want the first focal plane option. Both have valuable additions to the world.
The reticle is a critical part of a riflescope. Now, let’s discuss the features that make up the majority of each Zeiss system.
Features are a critical part of a riflescope and will determine how well you can adjust to certain climates and technological impacts on the move. Each has something different to offer the user.
The impact point correction of the Conquest is ¼ MOA per click, while the LRP has a correction of 1/10 MRAD per click. The Windage adjustment is 58 MOA and 24 MRAD respectively and the elevation is 103 MOA and 40.7 MRAD.
Both products also offer parallax correction. This system allows the user to adjust the image to match the plane, permitting a better shot. The Conquest has a parallax correction of 50 yards to infinity, while the LRP boasts 25 yards to infinity.
The winner in this category is the Zeiss LRP. It has much better adjustment capabilities and will serve you well in picking the best shot.
Next, let’s talk about environmental abilities. If a riflescope can’t survive in the great outdoors, it won’t last very long as a trusty scope option.
Everything from water to fog to high temperatures can hit your riflescope in the wild. The best riflescope manufacturers know this risk, developing their products with these issues in mind. Let’s see how Zeiss did in this category.
The Conquest and LRP are waterproof to the same depth, allowing the product to sink up to four meters deep in water before suffering damage. Most people don’t hunt around bodies of water that deep, but it is necessary.
The products are also fogproof, which is excellent if you’re hunting in humid conditions. They are filled with nitrogen to solidify the process, ensuring a quality finish and a lasting result.
Both products also have decent operating temperatures. The Zeiss will function from -12 to 122 degrees Fahrenheit, while the LRP works from -13 to 133 degrees Fahrenheit.
The winner in this category is the LRP, thanks to the operating temperature. It will withstand more than the competing Conquest.
We have one final category to consider. Let’s talk about the general features.
The general features of each riflescope are also valuable to consider. These are the intricate little details that make a difference.
Here’s what you can expect with the Zeiss Conquest and LRP, respectively:
- Maintube Diameter: 30 mm, 34 mm
- Battery: 1 x CR2032, 1 x CR2032
- Material: — Aluminum
- Dimensions: Length: 13.3" / 33.8 cm
- Objective Diameter: 2.2" / 5.6 cm" Length: 13.5" / 34.3 cm
- Weight: 22.2 oz / 629.4 g 32.8 oz / 930 g
These make up the details of each product.
The winner here is the LRP, again. It has quality material, a thicker maintube diameter, and a little more heft in the right way.
We’ve gone over plenty of details. Now - which riflescope is the winner?
The overall winner is the Zeiss LRP. It adjusts well, withstands high temperatures, and has a wider maintube. It’s an excellent product for your needs.
No matter which Zeiss riflescope you get, you will be happy. They are both quality items from a reputable brand, made to last.